Weekly Mulch: When will America be free from BP?

by Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium blogger

On July 4th, Americans are supposed to celebrate their independence. We may no longer have to worry about a greedy, distant monarch. But our country is still held in thrall to powerful interests that prize profit over individuals and their freedom—the energy industry comes to mind. As Jason Mark puts it at AlterNet:

“We’re in an abusive relationship and unable to leave our abuser. The plight of the people in Louisiana proves the point. Louisianans have been punched in the face by the hand that feeds them, and yet their biggest worry is that the oil and gas industry is going to walk out the door and leave them.”

Where’s the love?

It’s clear that BP, for instance, isn’t playing carefully with our country or its resources. At Mother Jones, David Corn relates the latest example of the company’s callousness. Its recovery plan had no stipulations about handling even a small storm like the one that stopped clean-up this week. It did, however, include plans to save sea life that hasn’t lived in the Gulf for millions of years. As Corn put it, the company was “prepared for walruses, not prepared for hurricanes.”

The biggest problem, of course, is that BP wasn’t prepared to handle a blow-out to begin with. The leak has gone on for so long that governmental officials are now taking unprecedented measures to protect the wildlife most vulnerable to its effects. Beth Buczynski reports at Care2 that official are going to dig up about 700 sea turtle nests on Alabama and Florida beaches that are at risk from the oil.

“Once the eggs have hatched, the young turtles will be released in darkness on Florida’s Atlantic beaches into oil-free water,” she writes. “Translocation of nests on this scale has never been attempted before.”

Halliburton

No matter how badly these companies treat us, it seems we can’t get rid of them. Take Halliburton. The company has latched its talons into the country and will not let go. It is second only to BP in shouldering responsibility for the Deepwater Horizon spill. As Jason Mark reports for the Earth Island Journal, just before the oil spill, Halliburton took over Boots & Coots, a company that deals with oil-well blowouts; that company now has a contract with BP to help with the relief well.

“Halliburton is essentially making money from causing the accident and then helping to repair it,” Mark writes. “Halliburton’s many-fingered tentacles is just the latest illustration of how powerful the company is.”

Wimpy Washington

Washington isn’t strong enough to fight back against that sort of corporate  power. Over the past year, energy interests have whittled down the climate change legislation to a tepid half-step. Right now it looks most likely that a bill that passes will regulate only the utilities sector.

“We believe we have compromised significantly, and we’re prepared to compromise further,” Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) told Politico this week after a White House meeting on the bill.

“If you’re looking for the sorry state of American energy politics distilled into one line, there it is,” writes Jonathan Hiskes at Grist. “Kerry fights harder for clean energy than just about any national politician.”

Still, if anything passes the Senate, Washington will celebrate. As Aaron Wiener explains at the Washington Independent, “For all the disappointment among environmentalists over the repeated compromises Democrats have made on climate legislation to win over moderates, some argue that a utilities-only cap would achieve most of the goals of an economy-wide carbon pricing scheme. The question now is whether Democratic leaders in the Senate can muster 60 votes for even a weakened bill to overcome a Republican filibuster.”

Our friends abroad

On an international level, our governing bodies might be doing a better job, but not by much. Inter Press Service reports that the countries at the meeting promised to scale back taxpayer subsidies of fossil fuels. Even that promise is limited, however. “Countries agree to phase out “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies” but each country decides what those are,” IPS reports. “Some countries like Japan, Australia, Italy and others have already said they don’t have any.”

And at Earth Island Journal, Ron Johnson heard a different story.

Johnson spoke to Kim Carstensen, who leads the World Wildlife Fund’s Global Climate Initiative, who compared this meeting’s report to that of the last G20 summit and found that climate issues had dropped off the radar. “There were eight references to clean energy in the final report from Pittsburgh (the last G20 Summit) and they have been completely vacuum cleaned,” he said. “That is kind of scary.”

Fight back

In situations like this, it takes massive pressure from outside to move the political apparatus forward. At AlterNet, Heetan Kalan has some ideas about how to progress—reach beyond the environmental community; enlist “doctors, nurses, public health officials and patients speaking out about the connection between consumers of coal energy and their immediate health concerns.” Kalan writes:

“After all, climate change is not solely an environmental problem — it is a human/planetary problem. If we are going to rely on a small base of environmentalists to carry us through this crisis, we are in trouble. Our spokespeople on this issue have to come from a wide spectrum of citizens and leaders.”

Certainly, they have to come from somewhere, and as Steve Benen writes at The Washington Monthly, whoever is speaking on this issue now, they’re not speaking loud enough.

“Lawmakers aren’t facing much in the way of public pressure,” he writes. “The polls look encouraging, suggesting the public is inclined to back the Democratic proposals, but that support hasn’t translated into aggressive advocacy — phone calls to lawmakers’ offices, letter-writing campaigns, district meetings, sizable rallies, etc….If engaged constituents want more, Congress will have to feel considerably more heat than they are now.”

In other words, if America wants to be free of coal, oil, gas, and the energy industry, we’re going to have to fight for it.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about the environment by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint. Visit the Mulch for a complete list of articles on environmental issues, or follow us on Twitter. And for the best progressive reporting on critical economy, health care and immigration issues, check out The Audit, The Pulse, and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of leading independent media outlets.

  • 2 Comments

The Spill….

This has been around for a few weeks, but it is just as funny/sad as ever………

  • 0 Comments

Climate Community Citizen of the Week – Alexis Chaves

Congratulations to Alexis Chaves this week’s Climate Community Citizen of the Week.  We have come to know about Alexis through another one of our winners – Sarah Elizabeth Ippel.  Alexis is a student at the Academy for Global Citizenship in Chicago (Sarah Elizabeth is the schools founder).

Although we do not generally work with grade school students we believe that Alexis is quite unique in the amazing work she is doing, and we are very proud supporters of her school.  The following is a short bit of background on Alexis:

Alexis Chaves: As a third grade student, Alexis is the Founder and President of the Endangered Species Club at the Academy for Global Citizenship. She and her team worked very hard and successfully raised $50 this year to protect a grey wolf. She would like to spend her $25 award on helping overfishing and protecting sharks and dolphins from fisherman. She is currently on a 5th grade reading level in school.

Alexis shares, “When I grow up, I want to be a paleontologist because I love animals. I am an inquirer because I want to be more knowledgeable about how to help our planet. I like learning about Math because there are lots of numbers.  I am a global citizen because I help the earth and want to protect our oceans. I help our planet by planting flowers. My favorite vegetable is broccoli because it tastes good.”

 

Congratulations again to Alexis, and all of the students at Academy for Global Citizenship – keep up the great work!

  • 1 Comment

Organic Flowers

Here we have another wonderful video from our friends at Eco Company TV:

Flowers are big business all around the world. But just like most food products pesticides are traditionally used to control insects and pests. But Eco Company’s Jordon visited one grower that uses good bugs or beneficial bugs to control bad bugs. She filed this report as she learned how this battle unfolds.

  • 0 Comments

Green Party for a great cause…

On Saturday we were a part of an absolutly fantastic party hosted by The Green Girls, and The Climate Community in which we raised money for a remarkable organization – EarthSpark International.

The GreenGirl Gurus

The most amazing aspect of the event was the ability of our wonderful hostess and friend Apple Levy to bring together such a wide array of people – representing the full spectrum of “green” – science, policy, consumer products… young, old, men and women. 

Dan - Climate Community - Cashdan

 As hard as the fight against Climate Change is, it is nice every so often to enjoy one another, have a bit of fun, and do some good along the way….

  • 0 Comments

Weekly Mulch: As risks for oil and gas grow, USSF offers change

By Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium Blogger

BP oil has been spilling into the Gulf of Mexico for more than two months, and while attention has focused there, deepwater oil drilling is just one of many risky methods of energy extraction that industry is pursuing. Gasland, Josh Fox’s documentary about the effects of hydrofracking, a new technique for extracting natural gas, was broadcast this week on HBO. In the film, Fox travels across the country visiting families whose water has turned toxic since gas companies began drilling in their area.

“So many people were quick to respond to our requests to be interviewed about fracking that I could tell instantly that this was a national problem—and nobody had really talked enough about it,” Fox told The Nation this week.

Natural gas

In Washington, even green groups like the Sierra Club have been pushing natural gas as a clean alternative to fuels like coal; reports like Fox’s suggest that the environmental costs of obtaining that gas are not yet clear. Besides water contamination, natural gas opponents are also documenting environmental damage to air quality. Like the problems with deepwater oil drilling, which became apparent after the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, the dangers of hydrofracking could go unchecked until disaster strikes.

And both deepwater drilling and hydrofracking are symptoms of the greater crisis threatening the country: as energy resources become harder to extract, energy companies are taking greater risks to get at the valuable fuels.

Drilling on government land

 

As Fox documents, new gas wells are popping up like gopher holes all over the country, on private and public lands. Just this week, Earthjustice, an environmental advocacy law group, challenged the Bureau of Land Management’s decision to allow drilling in a southwestern Colorado mountain range, the Colorado Independent reports.

“The HD Mountains are the last tiny, little corner of the San Juan Basin not yet drilled for natural gas development,” Jim Fitzgerald, a farmer, told Earthjustice. “This whole area depends on the HD Mountains watersheds. Drilling could have disastrous effects upon them.”

From coast to coast

Coloradans are not the only ones pushing back against drilling. In The Nation, Kara Cusolito writes about the problems Dimock, PA, has faced:

After a stray drill bit banged four wells in 2008…weird things started happening to people’s water: some flushed black, some orange, some turned bubbly. One well exploded, the result of methane migration, and residents say elevated metal and toluene levels have ruined twelve others. Then, in September 2009, about 8,000 gallons of hazardous drilling fluids spilled into nearby fields and creeks.

After that second incident, fifteen families began a lawsuit against Cabot Oil and Gas, the gas company that’s dominating that area. In The American Prospect, Alex Halperin wrote a couple of months back about efforts to fight back against natural gas drilling in Ithaca, NY.

Regulation

One of the problems with hydrofracking is that it’s poorly regulated right now. No one except the natural gas companies know what goes into the “fracking fluid” that they pour into wells to help bubble the gas up to the surface. A loophole in the Safe Water Drinking Act also exempted the practice from regulation.

That situation could be changing, however. As Amy Westervelt writes at Earth Island Journal:

“Thanks in large part to the work done by a handful of journalists and angry residents over the past couple of years, the EPA is finally looking into fracking more seriously. In fact, they’re looking into it so comprehensively the energy companies are getting worried. It’s worth noting here that all the big oil guys have a big stake in natural gas drilling, and many of them have contractual loopholes with the smaller companies that own the gas drilling leases that if fracking is taken off the table as a legitimate drilling process, they’re out.”

Like deepwater oil drilling, fracking is a relatively new endeavor, the risks of which are not fully understood. Unlike that type of drilling, though, the opportunity still exists to create a framework in which the companies will have some accountability to the environments and communities that they threaten.

Future present

 

Besides regulating the industries who are providing energy now, the environmental community needs to keep pressing towards a future where the country does not depend on fossil fuels like oil and gas to run our world. This week, at the U.S. Social Forum in Detroit, thousands of people are considering how to fight against problems like these.

Ahmina Maxey, for instance, is a member of the Zero Waste Detroit Coalition. “We are planning, next Saturday, the Clean Air, Good Jobs, Justice march to the incinerator to demand that the city of Detroit clean up its air,” she told Democracy Now!

Green Detroit

As Elizabeth DiNovella writes for The Progressive, Detroit is working towards green solutions to some of its problems. DiNovella reports:

“Detroit’s population has shrunk to about a quarter of what it was forty or fifty years ago, leaving lots of open green space. But neighborhood groups are transforming these vacant lots into community gardens. Seven years ago there were 8o community gardens, consisting of neighborhood gardens, backyard patches, and school gardens. By 2009, there were 800 community gardens. This year there are 1200, including some urban farms.”

“As far as I’m concerned, Detroit is ground zero for the sustainability movement,” writes Ron Williams for Free Speech TV. He explains:

“What we need now is a collaborative effort that could echo around the world. An Urban Green Lab. What possible better stage than the 11th largest city in the United States which is experiencing Depression-level economic conditions? Let’s take sustainability home. Collectively we have everything the people of Detroit need to build their city anew. Their solutions are likely to be the very same solutions every community will need in some form in the years ahead.”

Here’s hoping ideas like this take root.

  • 0 Comments

A Vegetarian’s Dilemma

I am not a self-righteous vegetarian.  In fact, I’m quite an insecure vegetarian, frequently seeking justification for my one or two servings of dairy a day and the occasional egg.  I say to myself, “it’s okay since I only buy and consume dairy and eggs from local, organic sources…right?”  And thus begins the insecurity.  There’s always a voice in the back of my head reminding me that by eating any animal product, I remain complicit with the meat industry.  But, I choose not to be a strict vegan, and instead try to strike a balance between a mostly vegan diet and a conscious vegetarian diet.

My reasons for relying primarily on plant food sources are many, but a major factor in my initial decision to become vegetarian was the environmental costs associated with the meat industry– many of which, I would argue, are externalized.  A 2006 report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UN found that animal agriculture emits 18% of human-induced greenhouse gas emissions. (1)  That’s more than the transportation sector.  Needless to say, increased meat consumption worldwide thus contributes heavily to climate change and its consequences– including, somewhat ironically, threats to food yields.

While discussions of climate change often focus on carbon dioxide as the guilty party, other greenhouse gases– namely methane and nitrous oxide– are also major contributers, and also have a greater greenhouse warming potential (gwp) than carbon dioxide.  Agriculture is a major contributer of these latter two, but other parts of the food system contribute carbon dioxide from the use of fossil fuels in transport, processing, retailing, storage, and preparation. (2)
Even with a high degree of processing and a long journey from farm to plate, vegetables and fruits are quite low in terms of their “greenhouse gas load” whereas beef, cheese, and pork are among the highest. (3)   Cheese?  I suppose that makes sense, but I can imagine that this is depressing news for many vegetarians.

So while meat eaters have a straight-forward strategy to reducing the environmental impact of their diet (meatless Mondays, anyone?), a vegetarian’s challenge is reducing his or her consumption of dairy and eggs.

But, as with all things, I believe reducing the environmental impact of our diets is about striking a balance.  A vegan diet can be socially limiting, and, in some cases, highly processed (think veggie crumbles, soy cheese, chik’n…) which is one reason I have chosen to be vegetarian.  Instead, I limit my consumption of animal products and, when I do buy milk or eggs, I choose them mindfully.

The bottom line?  No one is off the hook when it comes to the environmental impact of his or her diet.  We all have ways in which we can become more conscious consumers and thus contribute to a more sustainable food system.

1. Koneswaran, Gowri, and Danielle Nierenberg. “Global Farm Animal Production and Global Warming: Impacting and Mitigating Climate Change.” Environmental Health Perspectives. 116.5 (2008): 578-582. Print.
2. Carlsson-Kanyama, Annika, and Alejandro D Gonzalez. “Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change .” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 89.5 (1704S-1709S): 2009. Print.
3. Carlsson-Kanyama, Annika, and Alejandro D Gonzalez. “Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change .” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 89.5 (1704S-1709S): 2009. Print.
  • 3 Comments

Oil spill…the gift that keeps on giving!

  • 0 Comments

Climate Community Citizen of the Week – Dan Schnitzer

Congratulations to Daniel Schnitzer this week’s Climate Community Citizen of the week. We met Dan many months ago through one of our close friends and a founder/advisor of ours Ted Steck of The University of Chicago. Dan has an amazing background and as you will read an enormous heart.  For years Dan has been working to raise the standard of living for those in Haiti – primarily through the introduction of renewable energy to the nation.  But, from the time of the earthquake on Dan and his team have been working day and night to save lives and to bring small scale solar lamps to the women and children of the nation who are most at risk.

The following was provided to us by Dan:

Dan is the Co-Founder and Executive Director of EarthSpark International, a non-profit organization dedicated to eradicating energy poverty in Haiti.

EarthSpark is presently engaged with several communities and numerous NGOs, multilateral institutions and for-profit ventures in an effort to develop financially sustainable supply chains for clean energy technologies.  Dan has visited Haiti many times and resided there from October 25 to December 12, 2009.  In the wake of the earthquake, EarthSpark has raised funds to distribute 3,000 lamps to women living in internally displaced persons camps in the Port-au-Prince area.  He works for EarthSpark on a volunteer basis.

Starting in January 2010, Dan became a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University.  His research at CMU is on the transient stability of large-scale power systems with high penetrations of wind energy.


Prior to starting at CMU, Dan worked at KEMA, Inc., an energy consulting firm, for two years.  At KEMA, his work focused on energy efficiency and renewable energy policy, engineering, and system analysis.

Dan graduated from the University of Chicago in June 2007 with a B.A. in Physics, Economics and Environmental Studies. As co-president of the Green Campus Initiative and a founding member of the student-faculty-administration Sustainability Council, he was heavily involved with designing sustainability policy for the University.

In addition to being our winner this week – EarthSpark is the charity we have chosen to recognize at an event June 26th which we are jointly hosting with our good friends The Green Girls.  If you are interested please join us and consider this very worthy cause.

Finally – congratulations again to Dan and his team – keep up the great work!

  • 0 Comments

Energy Finance for Real Estate

Davida Heller / June 23, 2010

On Tuesday, June 8, The Urban Land Institute Climate Change, Land Use, and Energy Initiative hosted a forum at the recently retrofitted Empire State Building entitled Energy Finance for Real Estate.  The event was held on the 61st floor of one of New York City’s most treasured buildings, which is in the process of receiving an extensive energy facelift as an extensive retrofit is underway.  From 7:30am to 5:30pm, building owners, lenders, investors, sustainability executives, and public officials hashed out topics including energy efficiency initiatives, government regulation, risk calculation and how to access capital in the retrofit market, of financing.  Essentially, the question on everyone’s mind was how to make energy improvements financially viable. 

During the first panel of the day about the current state of the commercial real Estate industry with regard to energy efficiency, Charles Leitner, the global head of RREEF explained, “Capital is looking for something new…the next trend.  Everybody who manages money has the responsibility to demonstrate financial performance.  Capital is part of the solution, not the problem.”

Gregg Saunders, CFO of Codding Enterprises, who later presented a case study of his company’s work in Sonoma Mountain Village, says “Owners are really struggling on how to survive.”

Other panels included The State of Energy Efficiency Markets, Financial Strategy Implementation, New Tools and Rules for Market Transformation, Implementing Finance Strategies, The Empire State Building Story, An Energy Finance Case Study, Making Energy Districts Work and a Bankers Roundtable about Unlocking Capital Markets with Bankers hosted by Climate Community’s founder Dan Cashdan.

Anthony Malkin, President of Malkin Holdings, discussed the retrofit project currently underway at the Empire State Building with over $4 million projected in energy savings per year.  Windows were actually retrofitted inside the building, rather than taken off-site or replaced. The building is now the largest wireless unity. Every louver, radiator, fan, pump are all linked wirelessly to a DDC system operated and monitored out of Milwaukee to provide constant, real-time commissioning. 

While no one walked away with concrete answers for how to effectively finance energy efficiency within the real estate market, the event generated active, thought provoking discussion among the forum’s attendees.  A common point of discussion during the event was the current need for and lack of tangible data on energy retrofitting results from retrofitting, which would push forward substantial lending in the area, but in the meantime the demand for green building must come from the user, not the investor or the lender.  But, why can’t the investor or the lender educate others on the value of green building and energy efficiency? It seems a new definition of the term “value” is what is truly needed.  As green building practices, holistic approaches to business development, triple bottom line accounting and health issues come to light the “value” of a property can no longer simply be defined in financial terms, nor can the financial value only be applicable to monetary income. 

www.uli.org

  • 0 Comments